GOBankingRates works with many financial advertisers to showcase their products and services to our audiences.
These brands compensate us to advertise their products in ads across our site.
This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site.
Commitment to Our Readers
GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information.
you could read more about oureditorial guidelinesand our products and servicesreview methodology.
In polling up until the election, Trump maintained a slim yet consistent lead on economic issues.
It may be time to admit it: A President Kamala Harris would have been better for the economy.
Conversely, Rulfs sees Trumps tariff policy as disrupting global supply chains andincreasing costs for consumers and businesses.
When tariffs hike costs, they impose unnecessary pressure on the affordability of goods and services.
Harriss focus on international collaboration and trade agreements would have greatly mitigated this risk.
Kamala Harriss proposals were structured around direct support for working families and long-term economic security.
Joubert adds that this impact would have been quick and widespread, strengthening demand for goods across communities.
More From GOBankingRates
Share This Article:
The Latest inMoney
